Admittedly, 75 years old, none of these guys are stock, but a few are close.
I must admit, this would be a dream trip.
I must admit, this would be a dream trip.
Last edited:
Influencer I
20298
Western Canada is staggeringly empty, even compared to the Inland Northwest of the US where Im at, and by most standards we are empty. I always laugh when the Canadian truckers roll into my shop and call Spokane "the big city down south".a good indication of size- you can fit 365 Luxembourgs in BC alone, 2586 sq kms vs 944 735 sq kms.
go past Prince George and you can go hundreds of miles without a gas station. most "towns" in BC are under 5000 as rgallant points out, up north almost all "towns" are usually just a few houses of native settlements with no amenities.
we go out in the bush for a week or two at a time and quite often will come across NOBODY.
BC is a place where you can still get lost in the woods 20 minutes from your home..
Advocate I
And I agreed with you. I know Canada is mostly empty and vast. US is vast too but much more densely populated. A trip in Canada would be great, but my wife hates cold.. :) . For me the less people there are, the better.@leeloo It is hard to explain just how big and empty of most western, northern Canada is. People look at maps but that does not really explain it. It takes about 8 hours to go from Vancouver to Alberta border on the hi-way averaging 100km/hour (785 KM) and there are long empty stretches. Once you hit the town of Hope about 1 hour 30 minutes out of Vancouver there are about a dozen stops the rest of the way and most of them very small under 5000 people. You can do a lot of it off road, it took me just over 4 days, and about 1400KM with less 300 on pavement, I saw less the 10 people in that entire time (off road). Parks bypasses and gas were my only hiway traffic.
Advocate I
This really sums it up perfectly, there are vast area's you can get to everywhere without lockers, large lifts, crazy big tires etc.My point is that you can use a smaller, stock vehicle easy. With a stock 4x4 that has low range, either it is a new pick up, a 20 year old land cruiser, a jeep or what ever, enough remote beautiful places are accessible that you will need a lifetime to see it all. And with skills you can go, slower maybe but you can go in 99% of the places where modified vehicles can.
Contributor I
100% I agree. But on the list of mods, after 10 years with a Rubicon, the only mod which will make a massive difference to both capability and treading lightly is selectable lockers. Lifts and tires are ego, peer pressure, lockers are the invisible difference. I use my lockers often. I never use my winch. No one will know you have them.This really sums it up perfectly, there are vast area's you can get to everywhere without lockers, large lifts, crazy big tires etc.
Influencer I
20298
Member III
16986
That's interesting. I have an 08 Escape with 4 wheel drive. I've often thought about how it would do if it was raised up about 6" and could get rid of a bunch of fiberglass front and rear. I think there would be too much expense and not enough after market goodies to make it a reliable off road rig.I did a lot of crazy stuff off road with my old ZR2 S10. The GM factory Eaton govlock works very well out of the box. The only place it struggles (read the fly weights get sheared) is with big tires and lots of power.
Also like I have said before, I really dont miss my bobbed locked and lifted 86 Toyota. My 05 Escape actually articulates better, is more comfortable, has more power, tows better, and gets better fuel millage. Only thing it doesnt do that I did with the Toyota is rocks, and thats because I didnt care about hammering the Yote, but honestly if the Escape had good bumpers, slider, and skid plates (like my Yote did) I would run it through big rocks too.
I had NO idea that an older Ford Escape checked off that many boxes...I did a lot of crazy stuff off road with my old ZR2 S10. The GM factory Eaton govlock works very well out of the box. The only place it struggles (read the fly weights get sheared) is with big tires and lots of power.
Also like I have said before, I really dont miss my bobbed locked and lifted 86 Toyota. My 05 Escape actually articulates better, is more comfortable, has more power, tows better, and gets better fuel millage. Only thing it doesnt do that I did with the Toyota is rocks, and thats because I didnt care about hammering the Yote, but honestly if the Escape had good bumpers, slider, and skid plates (like my Yote did) I would run it through big rocks too.
ha-ha-ha...how utterly. moronically. stupid...among your other brilliant "observations"
just jealous cause yours are smaller, much like your outlook on such matters....it's tire envy i belive you have.
or probably because you just can't pony up.
real trucks run real tires, not your girly little 205's.
and no, i don't want to hear or give a dam about your fuel mileage or other WRONG assumptions.............................................................
Rumbledawg:ha-ha-ha...how utterly. moronically. stupid...among your other brilliant "observations"
just jealous cause yours are smaller, much like your outlook on such matters....it's tire envy i belive you have.
or probably because you just can't pony up.
real trucks run real tires, not your girly little 205's.
and no, i don't want to hear or give a dam about your fuel mileage or other WRONG assumptions.............................................................
Member III
Ok, but your answer is still mainly describing a fight between you and Billiebob rather than informing the rest of us why you think just a lift and bigger wheels is better than just lockers front and rear.
That's what I'm looking to know.
I've got a stock GMC Sierra with an Eaton G80 in the back. In your opinion, if I could choose only one..., would I be better off installing a front locker and maybe an on-demandear locker, like Billiebon says, or would I be better off getting larger wheels/tires under my level like you seem to advocate. And why?
Member III
Thunder,Ok, but your answer is still mainly describing a fight between you and Billiebob rather than informing the rest of us why you think just a lift and bigger wheels is better than just lockers front and rear.
That's what I'm looking to know.
I've got a stock GMC Sierra with an Eaton G80 in the back. In your opinion, if I could choose only one..., would I be better off installing a front locker and maybe an on-demandear locker, like Billiebon says, or would I be better off getting larger wheels/tires under my level like you seem to advocate. And why?
Thank you for that, Capn' Stout. I'd rather get that kind of information instead of watching potshots be thrown back and forth like a tennis match without much real info to be gained. I guess that what I was trying to wrangle out of Rumbledawg but he didnt bite and take the informative road. He did bite into the argument road, but what can I sayThunder,
If you are doing the technical off-road type trails, an LSD front, 2ish inch lift, and some 33s if you can. A lift and bigger tires give better articulation, ground clearance, and ride. The Gov bombs (g80) is going to do 99% of what you will probably be doing. And truth be told work pretty damn good. Torsen LSD for the front would be a decent upgrade to boot.
If you are rock crawling...lift tires, selectable lockers.
I have found a stock rig with upgraded tires and a locker will do 99% of what I want to do.
Happy trails
Advocate I