you are talking about a rock crawler. I’m talking about an “overlanding” rig’s long term dependability. I’ll stand by my blanket statement concerning “ overland ” vehicles. If it were not true, world wide sales of Toyota trucks would have dried up a couple of decades ago. There is one extremely good reason that ‘merican pickup trucks cannot compete overseas, and that reason is long term dependability . One thing that keeps merican pick up trucks dominating in sales in the US is regulation. Imagine if all models of all Landcruisers or Nissans were permitted to be imported into the US, going back to the late 60s. Imagine a LC 79 series competing with the new Jeep pickup. Imagine a 70 series Troopy. Back in the 70s politicians began doing everything possible to keep Toyota trucks and their robust line of SUVs out of the country. They knew that the Fords, Chevys, Dodges, and later on Jeeps, wouldn’t have a chance st keeping viable market shares. So, only luxury Toyota trucks, an Americanized line of Toyota pickup trucks, and the same kind of Nissans or Mitsubishis couldn’t be imported. So, the next time anyone wants to complain about regulation they ought to be thoughtful and be grateful for the merican made pickup truck they are driving. BTW, been driving solid axle front end for decades, Ford, Jeep and now Toyota, all with aftermarket suspensions and never once experienced the dreaded death wobble.
Your initial response to another user was “you will never own an IFS equipped vehicle. They are that bad”. However, you have praised Toyota IFS as superior to domestics. Well, good for you, you’ve made a decision and stuck to it. My disagreement is with your blanket statement regarding your claimed superior Toyota IFS to all other domestics IFS. I still stand by this argument, that Toyota IFS is no stronger or better than domestics IFS, especially when it comes to Overland usage. If we are comparing Overlanding to Overlanding, Toyota IFS is no more superior to domestics IFS. The designs are all the same from Toyota to domestic, because it works, is cheaper, and provides a better ride for the majority of consumers.
However, now you have changed the scope of your argument to quality and dependability. I would ask you, what quality are your referring to; Engine components, transmissions, transfer cases, wiring harness? IF this is what you are referencing in your quality statement, then yes, I would agree with your idea, to a point. During the 70’s to 90’s, Toyota’s quality was better than domestic, and this period is what gave Toyota a leg up in the automotive industry. However, domestics have stepped up their game in an attempt to match Toyota’s quality.
As for overseas, one of the largest factors as to why domestics have not gained a larger footprint is the cost of fuel. Gas overseas is priced in liters, and is significantly more expensive overseas than here in the States.
I can certainly respect your point of view for Toyota solid axle vehicles, they are most certainly stronger than IFS. There is no argument about that. However, are they more comfortable? That depends on the suspension setup. The FJ40 land cruisers, with a solid axle, had a leaf spring setup with a shackle on the front of the leaf spring, which gave a horrible ride. The same goes for the ’84 4Runner with a leaf spring, only the shackle was moved to the rear of the spring, still a rough ride. Then, if anybody decided to put a lift on these, they became dangerous as the pitman arm (even a dropped arm) created bump-steer that was not only unpleasant, but downright dangerous at times.
It seems you have certainly cast your lot with the Toyota FJ80 Landcruiser that provided a coil-over suspension, and a solid axle with lockers and Birfields. By the way, these Birfield joints are the predecessor to the CV axle, they can be blown up too.
So what’s next on the scope creep? Seating on the domestics not to your liking? Being that you are posting this ire in a Silverado thread, you must have some serious disdain towards GM or Chevy.