@Michael good video. Thanks for putting that together.
To try to add to the broader conversation:
Form following function works for me. It’s ugly, but its growing on me. That said, there seems a lot on offer from an overland perspective. The big gripe is range (way more than enough for daily for me). On trail, wouldn’t expect the same % range hit I see in my trucks (no idle loss share on slow stuff), but there’ll still be a hit. Refueling logistics then kick in and there’s no Titan tank / cans for that one yet. That said, jury is out till we can get in the seat and put in miles. Too early to pass judgement for me.
With respect to range, my hope is there’s a digital jerry can option, great rollout of pull through Superchargers at 250kW+ rates, or the like. Otherwise, if OTG for a few, curious how much yield the solar tonneau options get during the day (15-20 miles base is interesting), what solar awnings could bump that to (50 would be conceivable and wild; not gonna help in the trees though), and possibly what a genset would do overnight in a pinch (or while you drive if it’d accept the charge).
Like most things, decent trip planning and it looks like a lot of fun. If you’re a full timer, hermit, long hauler, lovers of non-wierd trucks, or favor more established solutions, doubt it’s the truck for you. Wouldn’t spend the time getting particularly riled up. If you either 1. love getting oil changes (I respect that; go in peace) or 2. put a deposit on everybody’s favorite little piggy, the Rivian (oink proudly my friend), nothing to worry about with ole Iron Sides.
Before somebody goes, “what sort of lilly livered liberal are yah?”, I’m a lover of dinoburning and electrons alike. Solid axles and IFS. They have their place. Got a soft spot for lockers, MTs, pinstriping things beyond what’s reasonable, hold my beer moments, etc. Desert or forrest, I’m a happy camper.
Presently, I run a Ram 2500 CTD work truck (I’d do bad things for a Prospector XL one day), ZR2 Baby Duramax, and a Model S. Yeah Dr Jeckle and Mr Sparky. Had a JKU Rubicon a while back too. All dang good vehicles within certain use cases. Jeep would climb like a goat. Ram pulls like a... well ram. ZR2 lacks the flex, but is a great efficient platform and the aftermarket is starting to really take notice.
Curious thing about the Teslas is the news seems to tell me I should or shouldn’t like Tesla depending on all sorts of nonsense. All that tells me is news groups sell a ton of clickbait and bull$hit. In my experience Tesla’s are built like tanks, are hyper efficient, have next to zero maintenance, and they get better faster than any car I’ve seen. They do that last part with new software periodically and by packing physical improvements from user feedback into production many times per year. Imagine if Ram had 6-12 sub model years EVERY year. By the time you find something to criticize, your point is about 5 minutes from losing relevance. Speaking about the hardware, software, engineering, etc. That said, they certainly have their limitations as well. With respect to Musk, think what you like.
Relative to my Ram CTD, the expected upshot on the CT (assuming it uses the lessons of the S,X,3 experience) is that it’s effectively silent (hunting potential), no DEF(you go buy more blue horse pee if you want to), similar torque figures to the HO Cummins, tougher carcass, most durable drivetrain I’ve ever pulled apart (not many moving parts, and freakin beefy), better drive system diagnostics, continual software and firmware refinement, redundant 1M rated motor systems (one drops and it goes neutral, others still pull you out assuming there’s not a full cascade failure), a flush armored underbody with huge clearance, no pumpkins to smack at inopportune moments, yada yada yada.
With respect to traction, the traction control system adjusts at the millisecond level. Without getting hyperbolic, it blow every other system I’ve used out of the water. It leads to tremendous confidence, reduced wear, etc. Imagine 2wd automatically turning effectively to 4 low, fully locked based on vehicle telemetry without losing momentum. On summer tires in just an S (dumb I know), they pull hard on literal sand and literal ice (tested both). Based on my experience, a Tesla with MTs may be next to impossible to get stuck.
Beyond that:
-Regenerative breaking means no more brake pads/rotors (unless you’re a legend).
-Center light bar means I’ve got a spare $500 for more beer.
-Load leveling suspension in camp.
-3500lb capacity is thicker than a snicker.
-35” tire from factory.
-Big ground clearance (that’s actually clear).
-Mountain of lockable storage.
-Low center of gravity.
-Looks like ac/heat may be directable to be bed, where you can effectively cap camp.
-Built in compressor.
-Big accessible batt depth for various camp uses)
-Autopilot takes the edge off paved highway sections and helps you enjoy the scenery.
-No paintwork to jack up, while wheeling tight trails
-Fully sealed drive and battery systems can handle water crossings without diff breathers, snorkels, or risk of hydro locking.
-Glass fail at the reveal, but another panel took a bunch of shots that would have broken anything I’ve ever had. More durable glass ain’t gonna hurt. If it starts hailing steel balls, then I’ve got more to worry about.
In the potential negative column, I’ve got questions on:
-the range, associated logistics, and algorithm predicting consumption in off-road conditions (important for plannining; it nails on road within 1% consistently for me)
-the sails interfering with the bed access. (If I can get a RamBox worth of ice and beer in there, I’d call it a worthy trade off)
-can a RTT and a Leitner equivalent be mounted without hammering the range because of the aero penalty
-air suspension is good for load, but for flex? Me thinks not. Curious how that’ll test out. Guessing it’ll behave similarly to a Disco’s new system.
-where the winch go?
If it sucks, you can laugh at me later.
Stay Sparky
Z