Tahoe or Ram 2500

  • HTML tutorial

Kasper_f76168

Rank 0

Contributor I

68
First Name
Kasper
Last Name
Brummer
Need some opinions on which vehicle I should build out for Overlanding between these two. Looking at which would give me the most capability and ease of repair/ aftermarket support. Thanks in advanced.

Specs

2013 Tahoe Z71 with about 115,000 miles, 5.3 V8 Tow Package, 6L80 transmission, LSD 3.42 in the rear, 4x4 with full-time, 4-hi and 4 lo. Ready to go.

1997 Ram 2500 Ext Cab Long Bed with about 248,000 miles, tow package, camper package, NP241, 4.10 gearing, Dana 60 front, Dana 70 with LSD rear 8.0L V10 with 47RE Auto. Needs a little work/ TLC.

Side note, if the 8.0L ever dies replacing with a 5.9 12v Cummins and plan on getting rid of the AFM on the 5.3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MazeVX

MOAK

Rank V
Launch Member

Off-Road Ranger I

2,865
Wherever we park it will be home !!
First Name
Donald
Last Name
Diehl
Member #

0745

Ham/GMRS Callsign
WRPN 506
There are those that will disagree with me, however, it is always a good conversation. Chevrolets have independant front suspension. The Dodge has a solid front axle. The solid front axle is easier to maintain, it is more dependable, and it is much better off of paved roads. The only downside to a SFA is that the ride is a bit more harsh than an IFS. I run with a guy that has an IFS Chevy with 90,000 miles and it has not yet made it through an annual inspection 3 years in a row, without having to replace bushings and getting realigned. I’m soon recieving my first brand new pick up truck in 37 years with a solid front axle. There is that, and as you mentioned, you could easily swap in a mechanical Cummins when the time comes and the NP241 is nearly indestructable .
 
  • Like
Reactions: grubworm

grubworm

Rank V
Launch Member

Member III

2,358
louisiana
First Name
grub
Last Name
worm
Member #

17464

Service Branch
USN-Submarines
ex-wife had a z71 ta-hoe (emphasis on the "hoe" :grinning:) nice to travel in and was fairly smooth and all, but i dont think it can compete with a ram. i had a 1999 ram 2500 with the 5.9 cummins that was a company truck in my construction company and it was a BEAST. ordered it with factory lockers and it was nearly impossible to stick and i used it many times pulling heavy equipment out of the muddy swamps down here. extremely reliable and just very well built. i later traded it in on a 2008 f350 with the new 6.4 powerstroke and quickly regretted that. i dont know much about the v10, but i can sure vouch for the cummins if you ever go that route
and yes, i REALLY liked having the sfa. back when i was in the navy, i had an '85 sr5 pickup...the last year toyota offered the sfa and that was an amazing pickup as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: MazeVX

smritte

Rank V
Launch Member

Member III

2,827
Ontario California
First Name
Scott
Last Name
SMR
Member #

8846

Ham/GMRS Callsign
KO6BI
Both vehicles are pretty much worn out. What's your budget for baselining and what mod's are you looking at? Are you capable of doing all the work or are you dependent on a shop?

Solid axle is strong with less parts. Independent is just as good if you build it correctly. Driveline lifespan is based more on how the previous owner treated it then brand. There are certain flaws with all brands that also need to be considered. Anything can be built to your needs.
 

ThundahBeagle

Rank V

Advocate I

1,548
Massachusetts
First Name
Andrew
Last Name
Beagle
Member #

0

There are those that will disagree with me, however, it is always a good conversation. Chevrolets have independant front suspension. The Dodge has a solid front axle. The solid front axle is easier to maintain, it is more dependable, and it is much better off of paved roads. The only downside to a SFA is that the ride is a bit more harsh than an IFS. I run with a guy that has an IFS Chevy with 90,000 miles and it has not yet made it through an annual inspection 3 years in a row, without having to replace bushings and getting realigned. I’m soon recieving my first brand new pick up truck in 37 years with a solid front axle. There is that, and as you mentioned, you could easily swap in a mechanical Cummins when the time comes and the NP241 is nearly indestructable .
Naw. I had no trouble at all passing annual inspection many years in a row in my 93 full size Blazer Silverado 5.7, no trouble in my 94 full size Blazer Silverado 5.7, and both were IFS with torsion bars. Have had no trouble in my 14 GMC Sierra 5.3 and thats IFS as well but with coil-overs. In over 200 thousand miles, never failed inspection for anything related to IFS.

Whoever is having trouble passing annual inspection with a 90,000 mile chevy truck IFS is treating it rough (not judging) without maintenance.

Yes it can take a little more maintenance, though, and there is debate if it is lesser off-road...ask a Toyota Tacoma owner if they hate it.

Having said that, I enjoyed the tar out of my 99 Jeep Grand Cherokee and that was the last of the solid front axle Grands. It was a reasonably comfortable ride, with a sunroof.

It's tough to warrant any vehicle with 250k miles, but it's also time to repair/replace that Tahoe transmission for good measure, so...

How are the frames?
 

ThundahBeagle

Rank V

Advocate I

1,548
Massachusetts
First Name
Andrew
Last Name
Beagle
Member #

0

Another thing to note: you are sort of comparing apples to oranges. Im not a Dodge guy, but clearly a 2500 series will have more hauling and towing capacity and any half ton will have a better ride, even if the half ton Chevy were solid axle.

If badge is meaningless to you, it's all tow, haul, condition and fuel consumption
 
  • Like
Reactions: El-Dracho

MazeVX

Rank VI
Launch Member

Influencer II

3,278
Gießen Germany
First Name
Mathias
Last Name
Kreicker
Member #

8002

Both are nice and capable rigs to start with, the ram will most likely need twice as much work initially than the Tahoe.

I would consider the personal factors here, what are you plan on doing, where do you want to go and how is the climate there?
Tahoe would be my choice, having my stuff inside the cabin is important for me. Better in wet climates and so on.
 

ThundahBeagle

Rank V

Advocate I

1,548
Massachusetts
First Name
Andrew
Last Name
Beagle
Member #

0

Both are nice and capable rigs to start with, the ram will most likely need twice as much work initially than the Tahoe.

I would consider the personal factors here, what are you plan on doing, where do you want to go and how is the climate there?
Tahoe would be my choice, having my stuff inside the cabin is important for me. Better in wet climates and so on.
I'm a GMC/ Chevy guy, and I used to love those full sized big old Blazers, so my first tendency is to gravitate towards a Tahoe. But clearly a Dodge 2500 has more "oomph!" but it's from 1997...that's a lot of tears ago. A much newer Tahoe? Yeah, I could use the lesser age to justify it

Frame condition would really be a huge factor. Rusted out rear frame tails, for example, would be a hard "no" unless you are a fabricator.

And price. You didnt mention pricing for either, did you?