Overland Bound, founding principles, item number one.
Pretty straight forward, and clearly of good intent. For the record I don't think "Overlanding" CAN be defined beyond that.
Now here we are today. the hobby having enjoyed exponential growth over the last few years, this forum being arguably the preeminent "overlanding" forum on the web has enjoyed the same exponential growth.
With that growth has come many ,many questions beginning with "Do I need........xxxxxxxx.........", and in most cases the OP will provide little or no context to go with that question. At that point, a critical error has been made, a question has been directed that simply can not be answered, unless the specific question is "Do I need a vehicle?" and I have never seen that question asked. Always the questions are gear specific.
Using as an example, the recent thread titled "Do I need an electric winch" (or some such similar), the OP asks what is seemingly a valid question, does so reasonably, and ostensibly seeking a reasonable answer. Fair enough, now go back and read the first item in the OB founding principles, because the ONLY possible answer when the question is devoid of context is "No". Overlanding can be sleeping in your Prius in the Kroger parking lot, riding the Dalton highway on a motorcycle, or the McKenzie trail in a full on built Jeep and every answer to the OP question, other than "No" will reflect the respondents own personal views and experiences as the term "overland" applies to him or her.
I think it is incumbent on the board members, moderators and staff of this site, when they see a question like that, to first direct the poster to those founding principles, and encourage them to bring context to the table, to avoid the predictable arguments that will inevitably arise as people rabidly defend their opinion.
I am as guilty as the next of defending my opinion, and mincing words is not a familiar trait to me. I get it, I'll do better, I'm just asking the rest of you to do something similar.
Pretty straight forward, and clearly of good intent. For the record I don't think "Overlanding" CAN be defined beyond that.
Now here we are today. the hobby having enjoyed exponential growth over the last few years, this forum being arguably the preeminent "overlanding" forum on the web has enjoyed the same exponential growth.
With that growth has come many ,many questions beginning with "Do I need........xxxxxxxx.........", and in most cases the OP will provide little or no context to go with that question. At that point, a critical error has been made, a question has been directed that simply can not be answered, unless the specific question is "Do I need a vehicle?" and I have never seen that question asked. Always the questions are gear specific.
Using as an example, the recent thread titled "Do I need an electric winch" (or some such similar), the OP asks what is seemingly a valid question, does so reasonably, and ostensibly seeking a reasonable answer. Fair enough, now go back and read the first item in the OB founding principles, because the ONLY possible answer when the question is devoid of context is "No". Overlanding can be sleeping in your Prius in the Kroger parking lot, riding the Dalton highway on a motorcycle, or the McKenzie trail in a full on built Jeep and every answer to the OP question, other than "No" will reflect the respondents own personal views and experiences as the term "overland" applies to him or her.
I think it is incumbent on the board members, moderators and staff of this site, when they see a question like that, to first direct the poster to those founding principles, and encourage them to bring context to the table, to avoid the predictable arguments that will inevitably arise as people rabidly defend their opinion.
I am as guilty as the next of defending my opinion, and mincing words is not a familiar trait to me. I get it, I'll do better, I'm just asking the rest of you to do something similar.