Moving from a Tacoma to an SUV, I'd love to hear your thoughts!

  • HTML tutorial

MontanaJoe

Rank 0

Contributor I

60
Montana, USA
First Name
Joseph
Last Name
Seifert
Member #

4169

Hello everyone, I've been lurking this forum for a while now and having been a part of automotive forums for about 15 years, I have to say I am extremely impressed by the welcoming, informative, and thorough posts I have found here. Bravo for having such a fantastic community!

I have been adventuring in my 2009 Tacoma (access cab, 6ft bed) for the last 6 years and 100k+ miles. It has been a great vehicle, but I think it is time to move on and get into an SUV. A truck used to be a necessity for me due to my line of work, though that is no longer the case. The ability to carry more people, having a good amount of space for gear, and being able to comfortably sleep in the vehicle if necessary, all while keeping the off-pavement capability of the Tacoma are currently my priorities with this next vehicle.

I do quite a bit of off-pavement adventuring, mostly mountainous Forest Service roads in Colorado and Montana, but also do quite a bit of desert exploration in Utah. That being said, I do not go beyond mild rock crawling and do not have a yearning to, either. My girlfriend and I currently sleep in the bed of the Tacoma with a hard shell topper and sleeping platform/drawer system, and would hopefully build a similar system in the SUV that can be folded up or broken down in order to use the second row to accommodate extra passengers.

Other than gear storage and the sleeping situation, I would like to be able to accomodate 33"s on the vehicle, and a 3"ish lift to fit those is definitely an option I am willing to explore. Bumpers front and rear (with winch and swingout), as well as sliders are something else I would like for peace of mind in the backcountry

My current vehicle considerations are:

80 or 100 series Toyota Land Cruiser (obviously) - Approximately $10-15k - This option ticks all the boxes, has huge aftermarket support, has a legendary reputation for off-road capability and reliability, and stock/unabused forms of both are relatively easy to come by. The price of these is my only issue, both the 80 and 100 series seem to be getting increasingly expensive.​
1st gen Toyota Sequoia - Approximately $5-7k - Another option that ticks the boxes, is extremely affordable compared to equivalent Land Cruisers, uses the same phenomenal 2UZ-FE, but the aftermarket options are definitely not as vast. It seems very possible to get suspension bits from other vehicles to build up a decent setup (Tundra coilovers, LC100 rear springs, LC80 rear shocks), but things like sliders and a rear bumper are tough to come by unless you go with custom builds. The Sequoia is also bigger than the LC's, but that isn't too much of a worry for me. Stock forms of these are very plentiful.​
XJ Jeep Cherokee - Approximately $3-5k - While this option is quite a bit smaller than the Toyotas, I think it still can accommodate my gear storage and sleeping situation well enough. The XJ is much much cheaper, and has an absolutely massive after market that has exceedingly cheaper options than the Toyotas. The Jeep also has a reputation for reliability (outside of cooling and steering issues that are easily taken care of). It is getting tougher to find examples of these that havent been modified or abused, but it can be done.​

These options all seem as though they would have similar fuel efficiency, similar reliability, and similar availability in my area of Montana.

I do have some questions though:

Since this vehicle will also be a daily driver, how much of a difference will suspension designs make in terms of comfort and driveability? Such as IFS vs. solid axle, coil sprung IFS vs. torsion bars, and coil sprung rear axle vs. leaf sprung.​
How big of a difference does the size of each of these vehicles make? The XJ is smallest by far, with the Sequoia being the biggest, what does this translate to in terms of storage, sleeping, and trailability? Does the Sequoia really feel that huge on the trail?​
Are there any considerations I am missing here?​
What would you buy if this was your money, either vehicles from my list, or others?​

Thanks so much for reading and I look forward to hearing your thoughts!

-MontanaJoe
 

M Rose

Local Expert
Mod Team
Member

Advocate III

5,584
Northeast Oregon, United States
First Name
Michael
Last Name
Rose
Member #

20990

Ham/GMRS Callsign
W7FSB
Service Branch
US ARMY Retired
Hello everyone, I've been lurking this forum for a while now and having been a part of automotive forums for about 15 years, I have to say I am extremely impressed by the welcoming, informative, and thorough posts I have found here. Bravo for having such a fantastic community!

I have been adventuring in my 2009 Tacoma (access cab, 6ft bed) for the last 6 years and 100k+ miles. It has been a great vehicle, but I think it is time to move on and get into an SUV. A truck used to be a necessity for me due to my line of work, though that is no longer the case. The ability to carry more people, having a good amount of space for gear, and being able to comfortably sleep in the vehicle if necessary, all while keeping the off-pavement capability of the Tacoma are currently my priorities with this next vehicle.

I do quite a bit of off-pavement adventuring, mostly mountainous Forest Service roads in Colorado and Montana, but also do quite a bit of desert exploration in Utah. That being said, I do not go beyond mild rock crawling and do not have a yearning to, either. My girlfriend and I currently sleep in the bed of the Tacoma with a hard shell topper and sleeping platform/drawer system, and would hopefully build a similar system in the SUV that can be folded up or broken down in order to use the second row to accommodate extra passengers.

Other than gear storage and the sleeping situation, I would like to be able to accomodate 33"s on the vehicle, and a 3"ish lift to fit those is definitely an option I am willing to explore. Bumpers front and rear (with winch and swingout), as well as sliders are something else I would like for peace of mind in the backcountry

My current vehicle considerations are:

80 or 100 series Toyota Land Cruiser (obviously) - Approximately $10-15k - This option ticks all the boxes, has huge aftermarket support, has a legendary reputation for off-road capability and reliability, and stock/unabused forms of both are relatively easy to come by. The price of these is my only issue, both the 80 and 100 series seem to be getting increasingly expensive.​
1st gen Toyota Sequoia - Approximately $5-7k - Another option that ticks the boxes, is extremely affordable compared to equivalent Land Cruisers, uses the same phenomenal 2UZ-FE, but the aftermarket options are definitely not as vast. It seems very possible to get suspension bits from other vehicles to build up a decent setup (Tundra coilovers, LC100 rear springs, LC80 rear shocks), but things like sliders and a rear bumper are tough to come by unless you go with custom builds. The Sequoia is also bigger than the LC's, but that isn't too much of a worry for me. Stock forms of these are very plentiful.​
XJ Jeep Cherokee - Approximately $3-5k - While this option is quite a bit smaller than the Toyotas, I think it still can accommodate my gear storage and sleeping situation well enough. The XJ is much much cheaper, and has an absolutely massive after market that has exceedingly cheaper options than the Toyotas. The Jeep also has a reputation for reliability (outside of cooling and steering issues that are easily taken care of). It is getting tougher to find examples of these that havent been modified or abused, but it can be done.​

These options all seem as though they would have similar fuel efficiency, similar reliability, and similar availability in my area of Montana.

I do have some questions though:

Since this vehicle will also be a daily driver, how much of a difference will suspension designs make in terms of comfort and driveability? Such as IFS vs. solid axle, coil sprung IFS vs. torsion bars, and coil sprung rear axle vs. leaf sprung.​
How big of a difference does the size of each of these vehicles make? The XJ is smallest by far, with the Sequoia being the biggest, what does this translate to in terms of storage, sleeping, and trailability? Does the Sequoia really feel that huge on the trail?​
Are there any considerations I am missing here?​
What would you buy if this was your money, either vehicles from my list, or others?​

Thanks so much for reading and I look forward to hearing your thoughts!

-MontanaJoe
Having owned both several XJs and a Toyota 4Runner, I felt the XJ cargo area was superior to that of the 4Th Gen 4Runner... but that is where superiority stops for me. I love XJs, don’t get me wrong (wish I still had my 2000 xj that I bought brand new in 2001), but to make it a good trail truck, the unibody needs to be addressed. The Toyota’s are great rigs, and very capable out of the box. Mild lift, armor, and you’re ready to go.
Now coming from a Full Size Ram down to a SUV, I find myself longing for the cargo room I once had...but don’t miss how tight it was on the trails. With that said a Tacoma would fit the bill pretty sweetly. Topper, RR, and so many more accessories would make it a rig on my list as long as it was the 4 door version... why isn’t the taco on my list? Because I’m a gear head from the 80’s.
 

MontanaJoe

Rank 0

Contributor I

60
Montana, USA
First Name
Joseph
Last Name
Seifert
Member #

4169

Having owned both several XJs and a Toyota 4Runner, I felt the XJ cargo area was superior to that of the 4Th Gen 4Runner... but that is where superiority stops for me. I love XJs, don’t get me wrong (wish I still had my 2000 xj that I bought brand new in 2001), but to make it a good trail truck, the unibody needs to be addressed. The Toyota’s are great rigs, and very capable out of the box. Mild lift, armor, and you’re ready to go.
Now coming from a Full Size Ram down to a SUV, I find myself longing for the cargo room I once had...but don’t miss how tight it was on the trails. With that said a Tacoma would fit the bill pretty sweetly. Topper, RR, and so many more accessories would make it a rig on my list as long as it was the 4 door version... why isn’t the taco on my list? Because I’m a gear head from the 80’s.
Thanks for the reply!

The XJ unibody is definitely something that is concerning, especially since they seem pretty susceptible to rust. But with the cost savings over the other two, it is still in the running as a good option, for sure.

And I definitely agree about the cargo space for the 4runners, both 3rd and 4th gen. Thats why I think a LC or Sequoia would probably be a better fit for us. The Sequoia has full size cargo capacity, but the LC has a more trailable exterior size. The biggest difference between these is the suspension designs. LC80 is solid axle with coils front and rear, LC100 is torsion bar IFS/coil rear, and the Sequoia is coils IFS/coil rear.
 

smritte

Rank V
Launch Member

Member III

2,827
Ontario California
First Name
Scott
Last Name
SMR
Member #

8846

Ham/GMRS Callsign
KO6BI
I have both, Tacoma and FJ80. Love my 80. Its the biggest off road vehicle i have owned and I wont go back. Your a bit low on your pricing though. The initial cost is about right but, add in about 5k + to baseline it.
Funny thing is, my 2019 access cab Tacoma is actually slightly bigger than my 80. Didn't realize it until i parked them next to each other.
 

MontanaJoe

Rank 0

Contributor I

60
Montana, USA
First Name
Joseph
Last Name
Seifert
Member #

4169

I have both, Tacoma and FJ80. Love my 80. Its the biggest off road vehicle i have owned and I wont go back. Your a bit low on your pricing though. The initial cost is about right but, add in about 5k + to baseline it.
Funny thing is, my 2019 access cab Tacoma is actually slightly bigger than my 80. Didn't realize it until i parked them next to each other.
Thanks for the reply! It's good hearing the opinion of someone who has a real world comparison of the two. And I definitely understand the baselining concept, those prices are only for the purchase price of the vehicle.
 

MontanaJoe

Rank 0

Contributor I

60
Montana, USA
First Name
Joseph
Last Name
Seifert
Member #

4169

For a Daily driver, it would be the FJ 100 but for off-road, it is definitely the Fj80...
View attachment 169564
Beautiful 80! And I completely agree. But finding the balance between the two is the key for my situation. Making the 80 a great daily while keeping off-road ability, or making the 100 a great offroader while keeping its daily driving ability.
 

smritte

Rank V
Launch Member

Member III

2,827
Ontario California
First Name
Scott
Last Name
SMR
Member #

8846

Ham/GMRS Callsign
KO6BI
I keep looking at the 100’s. The ones that have off roaded with me were nice but I like the fact I can sleep in the back of mine if needed.
fully kitted out, either would be nice. I think the 100 may get better mileage and may ride nicer with the IFS. Haven’t driven one to compare though.
 

Billiebob

Rank V
Launch Member

Member III

2,835
earth
First Name
Bill
Last Name
William
Member #

18893

Beautiful 80! And I completely agree. But finding the balance between the two is the key for my situation. Making the 80 a great daily while keeping off-road ability, or making the 100 a great offroader while keeping its daily driving ability.
I'd go 80. Easy to learn to live with a primative 80 4x4..... nearly impossible to make a 100 luxury liner as capable as the box stock 80. My daily is a TJR, I'd never "upgrade to??"
IFS just adds another maintenance issue with a bunch more flexible/breakable joints.