Enthusiast III
Finally! Someone on the other side of things with some intelligence to make a clear concise post. Your thoughts and opinions are valued.The purpose of the non essential travel order is to reduce over loading our health care system and hospital beds. Slowing the spread is definitely a result, but not the goal.
If you stay at home you will likely not have an accident nor get the virus. Quite right if you exit the house, you create a risk, the play in your own backyard..... or the 100 mile rule.... gives the option of fresh air, recreation, mental health too responsibly.
Those having zero empathy with the rest of my post, have at 'er, travel the country, just don't expect a warm welcome everywhere you travel.
Billiebob, I completely respect what you’re saying and follow your logic. This really only applies if it were true that everyone who got the Rona ended up in the hospital. As we know, this is not the case. I believe the 1 in 6 numbers or 20% numbers are false. I’ve read that 1 in 6 will have severe symptoms and also 20% have severe symptoms. I’ve known one person who has died with it, this person had a poor lifestyle and it was their right to choose that. I’m counting 11 people that I know personally, including myself, who have had it and showed symptoms of loss of taste and smell and received the little paper saying they’re part of the club. None have had to go to the hospital, I was close, I just told my wife I’m not going.
What I’m trying to get at is, someone from a different state shouldn’t be discriminating against me for choosing to leave my home. It’s my choice to leave and their choice to stay locked up away from society if they don’t want to risk it. Yes, it can be bad and if you have underlying issues, perhaps scary to know what awaits you if you contract it. That’s what friends and family are for. If I had a friend or family member who had issues, I’d welcome the idea of helping them. 95% of the population will be fine though so what’s the big deal?