Traveler III
That's a rather blanket generalization. A lot of the remote places that overlanders go, there is nobody else for hundreds of miles around whose "peace and quiet" would be disturbed.
I'm as much about protecting sensitive areas as anyone else. I would never camp on Cheam's alpine meadows, for example, because the flora there is truly very sensitive and takes a very long time to replenish when impacted. Having said that, there are also lot of people who like to grossly exaggerate the sensitivity of the environment, freaking out about people camping on barren, lifeless sand or rock, or in lush coastal rainforest - you couldn't stop the veg from growing there if you tried it grows so fast.
Can it be overdone? Sure, it can, I acknowledge that. Is that the norm? Absolutely not.
Unfortunately there are some people who characterize three jeeps in a remote campsite as if they were hosting Burning Man in a suburban neighborhood.
I'm as much about protecting sensitive areas as anyone else. I would never camp on Cheam's alpine meadows, for example, because the flora there is truly very sensitive and takes a very long time to replenish when impacted. Having said that, there are also lot of people who like to grossly exaggerate the sensitivity of the environment, freaking out about people camping on barren, lifeless sand or rock, or in lush coastal rainforest - you couldn't stop the veg from growing there if you tried it grows so fast.
Can it be overdone? Sure, it can, I acknowledge that. Is that the norm? Absolutely not.
Unfortunately there are some people who characterize three jeeps in a remote campsite as if they were hosting Burning Man in a suburban neighborhood.