I was considering adding a cb radio to my rig. Just to have an extra communication if I got jammed up.
Member III
One that you missed (or maybe you didn't and I did) is the size of the antenna.(I'm running out of advantages for my list!)
Off-Road Ranger I
Great point! To be perfectly honest I didn't miss it, I genuinely just didn't know that :D I only got a 78% on my HAM test so I've been tempted to back and do it again just to gain access to HF stuff but don't have a radio that'll do it -- the point is a lot of the technical side of radios is still a bit greek to me. (My lovely wife of course got 82% so she'll forever be the 'smarter radio operator' in our family!)One that you missed (or maybe you didn't and I did) is the size of the antenna.
A 1/4 wave GMRS antenna is about 6"... a 1/4 wave CB antenna is 108"
Sure you can get shorter CB antennas but they are a compromise over a true 1/4 wave.
You can get longer GMRS antennas that only improve performance.
Even a 5/8 wave GMRS antenna is only going to be about 16".
And something that goes along with that, less ground plane. You can mount a GMRS almost anywhere and get good performance.
Most problem with CB antennas is mounting them to a poor/improper ground plane.
I wouldn't rely on CB in a backcountry emergency unless you are travelling with others very nearby who have CB. It just doesn't have the range in most places a typical overlander is likely to go (even if typical only means occasional fire service roads or state parks -- it's still not got the juice to reach out for help).I was considering adding a cb radio to my rig. Just to have an extra communication if I got jammed up.
Traveler III
That was my suspicion too -- like I said, truckers used to be all over it (and may still). Given that most Overlanding requires a fair bit of slab before getting to the fun stuff, there's definitely an argument for something like CB. If all a person is looking for is off-road local comms, though (and assuming they aren't with a group already on CB), GMRS is probably a better choice in a lot of situations.And for a counter counter point. I was sitting dead still in a line of traffic a couple of weeks ago. Nothing on any FRS or GMRS channel. But a quick query on CB channel 19 gave me details on the incident and a suggested alternate route. CB is still king on the highway, and overall here in the Midwest. I know one other person with GMRS, none with a HAM license, and dozens with CB.
Advocate II
Advocate II
And for a counter counter point. I was sitting dead still in a line of traffic a couple of weeks ago. Nothing on any FRS or GMRS channel. But a quick query on CB channel 19 gave me details on the incident and a suggested alternate route. CB is still king on the highway, and overall here in the Midwest. I know one other person with GMRS, none with a HAM license, and dozens with CB.
Member III
It's too bad you can't have a radio that does it all huh? Well legally anyways.Darn. Do i just need to do all the radios?
Pathfinder I
I would earnestly 2nd all of this.Overland Mobile radio: Side hobby.
Communications: Absolutely Necessary
I think if you take a look at GMRS for local communications and perhaps some of the InReach/Spot type devices now have two way communication capabilities via text and e-mail, so you should be well covered for all situations you are likely to face as long as civilization hasn't totally collapsed.
HAM -- and I say this as a HAM license holder -- Is a whole separate community and hobby in addition to/on top of Overlanding but is not as useful as other modern technology for critical communication with the outside world when you are in the sticks. Even if there is a local repeater you can hit on 2M, there is no guarantee someone is listening if you need help. And if you are using high frequency (HF) there are a lot of atmospheric variables on connecting with someone and again, no one may be listening in your time of need. With a Spot or Inreach, if you are in a jam, you push a button and out come the choppers (or you use the two way feature to get the precise help you need if it's not an SOS). A vehicle rig and license will cost more than a Spot device too, just in dollars. Before these Spot-like devices developed, HAM was a good option but it's simply not the best choice anymore.
There's definitely overlap. The only time I've used my HAM while overloading is for local communications and weather reports/alerts, both of which can be done on GMRS. On the other hand, going out for a drive and chatting with folks 1000 kms away via AB's Linked Repeaters during net events is neat, and it's fun to be part of that community too.
In the event of an emergency outside of Overlanding -- like a weather event in your area or something like that -- even owning a ham radio and learning what the local repeaters are could be an asset --- you can download the repeater book app on your phone and a cheap BaoFeng. You cannot transmit without a license, but being able to listen is a great way to receive information if, in an emergency, cell towers may not be working (think of the overload post 9/11 where folks couldn't call or text). The other bonus is you may find later down the road that you want to get more in the hobby and you'll already have a bit of basic kit to learn with.
Not accounted for in the above opinion: How cool your truck looks with a couple of antennas, and how cool you feel gabbin' in the handset in the backcountry with some dude a thousand miles away. Hard to put a price on that [emoji1]
Off-Road Ranger I
Yeah, this is a much safer long thread starter than the "other one", which vehicle should I buy? Jeep or Toyota are the only acceptable answers, by the way!Note to self: anytime I want to start a long thread, just ask for opinions about overland comms and question whether or not they're necessary
I very much share this sentiment!Seriously though, the feedback and experiences in this thread are SO HELPFUL to me!
Traveler III
Another major problem with the Canadian rules is that GMRS units are forbidden to have a separate antenna - fixed, integrated antennas only. Basically GMRS in Canada is relegated to crappy hand held 2 watt units only.And an addendum to the GMRS vs HAM Debate -- if you are in Canada, you don't have the same freedoms as the Americans on GMRS bands, and if you need more than 3-4 kilometres of range reliably, you'd better take a serious look at HAM/2M radio.
http://www.marscan.com/Gmrs.htm
Looks like we are limited to 2 watts on GMRS which would severely limit range. I was wondering why I never see those Midland base stations in stores here, but this must be why.
My system will stick with HAM as I can do up to 50 watts easily and with a bluetooth adapter link it to my helmet's headset to talk to my wife in our jeep. I should reliably be able to get 20 miles or so which is plenty for us, even without repeaters.
Thanks for adviceI wouldn't rely on CB in a backcountry emergency unless you are travelling with others very nearby who have CB. It just doesn't have the range in most places a typical overlander is likely to go (even if typical only means occasional fire service roads or state parks -- it's still not got the juice to reach out for help).
Off-Road Ranger I
This completely depends on who is around you. When I lived in Minnesota CB is what we used vehicle to vehicle. Now that I’m in Utah, CB is nearly useless. No one here uses it on the trail and it doesn’t reach far enough for emergencies.I've got a CB which I still need to buy an antenna for, so I think that's a good choice to begin with?
Yeah, good point. I'm figuring the CB would mostly be for contact between those camping and traveling with me in their own vehicle. People I know, basically. A lot of the Crown land around my province is so sparsely populated (at least in my experience) that I'm guessing an EPIRB/ PLB would make the most sense without the HAM investment?This completely depends on who is around you. When I lived in Minnesota CB is what we used vehicle to vehicle. Now that I’m in Utah, CB is nearly useless. No one here uses it on the trail and it doesn’t reach far enough for emergencies.