Wow, I don't know how or why I found and managed to make it through the entire video but it's late, I'm awake and wandering all ends of the internet. It's sad to see just how much animosity there is towards the overland segment as a whole in the last few years at an alarmingly increasing rate, this video highlights that.
I was admittedly dismayed by Michaels comments when asked about redefining "overlanding" (around 20 min mark)
"When we started in 2010 overlanding didn't exist"
Seconds later he goes on to say it was not only defined but in fact "over defined" Is there such a thing if one is in fact bringing yet another new definition to the table?
He does tip his hat to Overland Journal, but even that was predated be half a decade by the Expedition Portal forum where ironically the definition and ensuring conversation on "what is overlanding" was already old hat by 2010, the word was getting tossed around in ever conversation alongside it's older brother "expedition". The forum has nearly 20,000 members in 2010 fwiw, it has 171k now. Does anyone know how many members at large the OB forum has?
Let me be clear, I'm not saying there is only room for one forum, club, group, etc... quite the opposite, I think there needs to be more. I myself helped kick off a Utah specific/based overlanding forum in 2009. My point is simply give credit where credit is due, from an offroad industry aspect (think SEMA and other global media aspects), Overlamd Journal, Expedition Portal and Overland Expo put this entire market place on the map a decade ago... all that despite the fact everyone agrees it existed long before the name in the US.
Let me preface this by saying I know Michael and Corrie on a fairly personal level and have the benefit of talking to them on a regular basis, so it's easier for me to understand hidden context in what Michael is saying.
I am fairly certain that when Michael said "When we started in 2010 overlanding didn't exist" he was not eluding to the notion that he created it or brought it to the US or any of that. His comments are typically the contrary. This, to me, seems way more like a, "When we started overlanding wasn't mainstream like it is now." Poor choice of words, and when he was called out on it he corrected himself. There are a lot of organizations and forums that influence the growth of the overlanding community at large.
Side note:
The position of Overland Bound, at least to my knowledge, isn't to recruit people into overlanding. It's to offer a safe place for people already interested to ask questions and be educated by the community. I think that is where overlandbound_fake is misunderstanding overland bound's mission. I was really hoping Michael would touch on that point but the conversation never really seemed to navigate in that direction. I was part of most of the other forums including the main, popular ones, and trying to get into overlanding was actually kind of hard. I was flamed regularly for asking questions. And it's not that I was a complete newb. I was switching from two wheels to 4 wheels. I have a great deal of experience overlanding on a bike. And I was met with a lot of trash talk and hostility. Overland Bound seeks to nix that elitism that a lot of folks run into and I think that is why a lot of the member base is green. To overlandbound_fakes, point, there is a lot of green in the member base. But there is also a lot of experience, and let's face it, we all started from nothing at one point. And whether one was mentored or figured it out on their own, we all made mistakes. The forums, no matter which one you prefer, are important to the community for spreading information. Some are more established than others. Some are finding ways to sustain themselves, and some are trying to innovate the ways we are able to supply and consume that information. Like em or not they serve, at their core, to educate, spread information, and connect people who call themselves overlanders. And I think what overlandbound_fake is missing, is that even if he somehow succeeded in getting rid of Overland Bound (not gonna happen) The issues he is afraid of still exist, they existed before OB and they will exist long into the future. Nobody is born with the knowledge. His unwillingness to work with all the communities who recreate on public lands (think, hikers, bikers, hunters, fishermen, etc...) is telling of his position (they are my trails and I don't want anyone else on them). Public land is public land. If we are unwilling to work together to keep them clean, safe and accessible we can kiss them goodbye. That is accomplished by education. Refuse to educate those who are going to use the land is failure to keep the land clean, safe and accessible. Just my two cents. Did not intend my side note to become that lengthy.