Pioneer II
- 8,178
- First Name
- DALE
- Last Name
- FOLLETTE
- Member #
-
23055
- Ham/GMRS Callsign
- KJ7JDA
- Service Branch
- US Army CWO (Ret)
Pioneer II
23055
Pioneer II
23055
Nice!At 12,000 feet just west of Breckenridge CO. Heading down the other side to those hot springs.
Pioneer II
23055
Nice!Here’s a few from the last 4 days around southern Utah
Builder I
I’m heading to Yosemite next week. Any suggestions for a good day hike?Some photos from our recent trip to CA. First time I've ever been to Yosemite. It did not disappoint.
Advocate III
We didn't do much hiking due to physical limitations in our group, but I don't think you can go wrong with any of them. I had never been there before, so there was a ton for me to see. Get there early and make sure you have a reservation.I’m heading to Yosemite next week. Any suggestions for a good day hike?Some photos from our recent trip to CA. First time I've ever been to Yosemite. It did not disappoint.
Pathfinder I
Builder I
Pathfinder II
Enthusiast II
Enthusiast III
Enthusiast III
I think the lens(Sony 16-35mm GM) may have taken a hit somewhere, it does some funky things sometimes, a few photos had some weird focus issues. I shoot maunal for for 99% of landscape shots and use the focus magnifier to get critical focus. It's out of warranty and I don't know how much Sony would charge to service it. Would love to get the new 14mm GM and 24mm GM primes to replace it but that's a lot on money.excellent photo @TOUGE! I am intrigued that you 'lose' focus at the middle of the picture but the front and back are in focus.
Contributor II
I would suspect too long of an exposure, it would explain the focus because the water would be moving and the rest of the scene is static. But that is just a guess.excellent photo @TOUGE! I am intrigued that you 'lose' focus at the middle of the picture but the front and back are in focus.
Contributor II
You can always rent a lens to try it out.I shoot Canon and I really want a RF 24-70 F2.8, but holy $$$. I take photos for me, so I have no revenue stream from it... Makes it much harder to justify.
Contributor II
I have the Sigma EF 100-400. It's a great lens, but I'd like to get native and they (Tamron or Sigma) don't make RF glass yet. The Tamron 24-70 is 1/2 the price though... The Canon EF to RF adapter has been sold out almost a year though and my off brand adapter isn't great.You can always rent a lens to try it out.
Canon makes great glass, maybe check out Tamron and Sigma, they’re improving their products all the time.