Autism Family Travels
Rank IV
Enthusiast III
This is the camper. Comes in at 3400 lbs. For what we need, this with the FX4 will be a dandy combination.
Enthusiast III
Enthusiast III
Only ecoboost option with FX4 package anyways. Towing that camper won't be an issue. As for milage, I have seen 17mpg ish when towing 4k for a long distance from various people. Still better than our F150 unloaded. I will take that all day long. 25-28mpg (stock) empty. Most place we will be towing is an 80-100km speed limit and low traffic. I am safe towing that rig where we are going. As for the lift, Mavericks have no issues with the lifts available for it and work great. I was going to get the eibach springs but I think I am going with the superlift 2.5 instead. Keep the shocks, ride and capacity the same and get a little more lift in the rear that the eibach does not provide. Unless I frankenlift it. Get the eibachs, and some parts to do a subframe 1" lift in the rear as well. I want to keep rake.I should also make a note in regards to gas mileage my bronco sport got 26 miles per gallon empty and after the water pump went out at less than 2000 miles it never got over 24 miles per gallon so I would advise you to look at owner reviews on fuel mileage for the Maverick before making a purchase based on fuel economy.
Enthusiast II
Enthusiast III
Enthusiast III
scout-campers-tuktut.webp (1280×720) (motor1.com)My build date is currently the end of July. EB Lariat with FX4 and 4k tow package. Strongly considered the Tremor but at my age and with my injuries a small camper is likely in my future. Planning on a lift when the OEM tires run out and some better tires. Might do lift early, who knows. Looking at racks for the back and RTT's plus a bunch of fun gear to go with it.
Last kid is heading to college, older one is moving back in the spring until she gets married next June. Starting to have visions of much more time on our hands. Plus, the son will be going to school in TN so we can check out trails there when we visit. Very excited. We bought our son an EB XLT FX4 for his college vehicle. Really impressed with it for what it is. It's very much a "real" truck, just a smaller one.
Enthusiast II
Nice! Jealous on the lift...Did your dealer say anything about a lift voiding warranty on certain parts? I heard on Maverick Truck Club that Bilstein is developing a Mav lift in concert with Ford that will NOT void warranty. But if your dealer is installing yours maybe it doesn't matter? I think you'll love the truck—lots of power and the AWD is excellent. Curios what overland rack you purchased?So, we have our order ready to go for a new XLT, Lux package (I want electric heated seats and autostart) 4k towing and FX4. We are adding the eibach lift, softopper, overland rack, Reika wheels, Falken AT3s, the bushwacker flares and hood scoop from ford to the loan so when we pick it up, It's all done, just gas and go. Then, get the camper and we are gone! Can't wait.
Advocate I
Your Mav is awesome, and I really want one myself. That said, c'mon a built T4R didn't "need" 4L to do the same sections you were doing easily in a Mav. There's a big difference between choosing to use 4L because it's just easier (and easier on the rig) and *needing* 4L. I run 4L a lot (sometimes with my front hubs unlocked so I have "2L") in my D'max/FWC setup because it sits at 10k lbs and it allows me to get up into gears where the torque converter locks (the TC will lock in 2nd and beyond in Tow Haul mode) and more effectively use the engine brake and generally keep trans temps lower without the TC churn (not that trans temps are ever an issue... but why not?). Just because I choose 4L in those situations doesn't mean I NEED it...My pal drives a built 4Runner and he needed 4wd low range to do the same sections
Enthusiast II
Appreciate your response—yeah, perhaps a poor choice of words. 'Used' 4wd low would have been more accurate. To that end, I do not think he could have done the section I am referencing in 2wd...Nor did he. But next time maybe he should try...I imagine a skilled driver could manage it. We'll test him! I also wouldn't say the Mav did the section too easily as compared to the 4Runner. Just to clarify, I do NOT think the Mav compares to a 4Runner offroad...To me, it's more comparable to an Outback Wilderness, maybe? Or a slightly modified Crosstrek? Especially with a lift installed. Also bear in mind the bits we did were bone-dry. It would be fun to do a tandem trip/run with an Outback to see a comparison. I haven't driven his 4Runner much...Way more hours behind the wheel of a built Samurai and 72 Bronco. Both of which were amazing vehicles, but only offroad sadly. You know, if I could afford a nice Tacoma or 4Runner...That's probably what I'd have. Or even the Ford Ranger. But I can't! The Maverick—to my mind—was fairly priced and spec'd for a new vehicle. It came in at 30K plus taxes :( I have confidence in it thus far...When it cools down weather-wise, I'll test it on Canyon Sin Nombre in Anza Borrego, and some other trails as well.Your Mav is awesome, and I really want one myself. That said, c'mon a built T4R didn't "need" 4L to do the same sections you were doing easily in a Mav. There's a big difference between choosing to use 4L because it's just easier (and easier on the rig) and *needing* 4L. I run 4L a lot (sometimes with my front hubs unlocked so I have "2L") in my D'max/FWC setup because it sits at 10k lbs and it allows me to get up into gears where the torque converter locks (the TC will lock in 2nd and beyond in Tow Haul mode) and more effectively use the engine brake and generally keep trans temps lower without the TC churn (not that trans temps are ever an issue... but why not?). Just because I choose 4L in those situations doesn't mean I NEED it...
-TJ
Advocate I
I'm not saying he shouldn't have used 4L, again I support using it way more than most people choose to. And it's not like he has to go 2W or 4L, there's always 4H too. ;) But, I get your points and agree the Mav is very impressive for what it is, and I still want one. ;)Appreciate your response—yeah, perhaps a poor choice of words. 'Used' 4wd low would have been more accurate. To that end, I do not think he could have done the section I am referencing in 2wd...Nor did he. But next time maybe he should try...I imagine a skilled driver could manage it. We'll test him! I also wouldn't say the Mav did the section too easily as compared to the 4Runner. Just to clarify, I do NOT think the Mav compares to a 4Runner offroad...To me, it's more comparable to an Outback Wilderness, maybe? Or a slightly modified Crosstrek? Especially with a lift installed. Also bear in mind the bits we did were bone-dry. It would be fun to do a tandem trip/run with an Outback to see a comparison. I haven't driven his 4Runner much...Way more hours behind the wheel of a built Samurai and 72 Bronco. Both of which were amazing vehicles, but only offroad sadly. You know, if I could afford a nice Tacoma or 4Runner...That's probably what I'd have. Or even the Ford Ranger. But I can't! The Maverick—to my mind—was fairly priced and spec'd for a new vehicle. It came in at 30K plus taxes :( I have confidence in it thus far...When it cools down weather-wise, I'll test it on Canyon Sin Nombre in Anza Borrego, and some other trails as well.
Enthusiast II
One thing is for sure—I get WAY better MPGs than him—ha! :)I'm not saying he shouldn't have used 4L, again I support using it way more than most people choose to. And it's not like he has to go 2W or 4L, there's always 4H too. ;) But, I get your points and agree the Mav is very impressive for what it is, and I still want one. ;)
Cheers,
TJ
Enthusiast III
The lift will not void anything other than the warranty on the stock springs here. They are not allowed to do that. I think we will love the rig too. Right now, I was told when we put our order in expect a 6-8 month delay for delivery. I am fine with that as we have the patriot and audi to drive. Plus the F150 whenever I need it.Nice! Jealous on the lift...Did your dealer say anything about a lift voiding warranty on certain parts? I heard on Maverick Truck Club that Bilstein is developing a Mav lift in concert with Ford that will NOT void warranty. But if your dealer is installing yours maybe it doesn't matter? I think you'll love the truck—lots of power and the AWD is excellent. Curios what overland rack you purchased?
Enthusiast III
How the Mav fares against the OBW.Appreciate your response—yeah, perhaps a poor choice of words. 'Used' 4wd low would have been more accurate. To that end, I do not think he could have done the section I am referencing in 2wd...Nor did he. But next time maybe he should try...I imagine a skilled driver could manage it. We'll test him! I also wouldn't say the Mav did the section too easily as compared to the 4Runner. Just to clarify, I do NOT think the Mav compares to a 4Runner offroad...To me, it's more comparable to an Outback Wilderness, maybe? Or a slightly modified Crosstrek? Especially with a lift installed. Also bear in mind the bits we did were bone-dry. It would be fun to do a tandem trip/run with an Outback to see a comparison. I haven't driven his 4Runner much...Way more hours behind the wheel of a built Samurai and 72 Bronco. Both of which were amazing vehicles, but only offroad sadly. You know, if I could afford a nice Tacoma or 4Runner...That's probably what I'd have. Or even the Ford Ranger. But I can't! The Maverick—to my mind—was fairly priced and spec'd for a new vehicle. It came in at 30K plus taxes :( I have confidence in it thus far...When it cools down weather-wise, I'll test it on Canyon Sin Nombre in Anza Borrego, and some other trails as well.
Enthusiast II
Very cool comparison. I think—for me—having the bed is a big plus. I am constantly at the beach and campsites...Having a spot to throw dirty stuff has nothing to do with offroad capability, but I love it so far. I personally think both these vehicles are super cool...Cool to see the AWD comparison at the end. I find myself using Mud/Ruts mode offroad, except for dunes/beach where I've used Sand mode (and it works well).How the Mav fares against the OBW.
2022 Subaru Outback Wilderness vs. Ford Maverick FX4 Overland Adventure - YouTube
Enthusiast III
Enthusiast II
We have the same trim. YES. Seats—for me—are very comfortable at 6'2" both front and back. Very comfortable to get in and out of as well. Hope you get your truck built fast!So me and Little man went and finally sat in one. It was an xlt trim which we will be buying. The seats are crazy comfortable. It's a great size, Little man had tons of room in front of his 6'1" chassis. He approves of the "cool" door handles on the inside. We are placing our order soon.
Enthusiast III
I found the exact same thing. I want to take possession by this time next year. Our mortgage is up for renewal, and we will have a bunch of stuff paid off then, and can get into the truck and have less monthly outflow than we do now. So, we will be in one by aug next year. Can't wait either. It's a great vehicle.We have the same trim. YES. Seats—for me—are very comfortable at 6'2" both front and back. Very comfortable to get in and out of as well. Hope you get your truck built fast!
Enthusiast III