It's a common refrain on the forums that there's no such thing as a "cheap" 4x4; you either pay MSRP for a new truck or put tens of thousands into an older one in a de facto restoration i.e. "baselining." Some vehicle communities are especially strident about this.
But I've found that this defeats the purpose of buying an older platform: getting into a capable 4x4 without breaking the bank. For example, 10 years ago, 80 Series Land Cruisers were seen as disposable off-road beaters. You could get them for a song and drive into the sunset without much worry. Nowadays some will insist on replacing everything before it's even broke. I'm not saying that's a bad strategy, but not everyone can afford that upfront cost, or else they might be buying something newer.
In my book, keep it topped off with fluids and watch the temps. Then fix stuff as it breaks. This is just my perspective though, and I'd be curious to hear other views on this. Is it better to dump tens of thousands into a new-to-you rig replacing everything you could possibly anticipate going wrong, or pack some tools and head-gasket sealer, check your fluids, and get out there?
But I've found that this defeats the purpose of buying an older platform: getting into a capable 4x4 without breaking the bank. For example, 10 years ago, 80 Series Land Cruisers were seen as disposable off-road beaters. You could get them for a song and drive into the sunset without much worry. Nowadays some will insist on replacing everything before it's even broke. I'm not saying that's a bad strategy, but not everyone can afford that upfront cost, or else they might be buying something newer.
In my book, keep it topped off with fluids and watch the temps. Then fix stuff as it breaks. This is just my perspective though, and I'd be curious to hear other views on this. Is it better to dump tens of thousands into a new-to-you rig replacing everything you could possibly anticipate going wrong, or pack some tools and head-gasket sealer, check your fluids, and get out there?