I didn't get a sense that the author of the article is "anti vehicle camping", sounds like he does it himself. He just hates the idea of RTT's as a symbol of what overlanding is going to become, what he calls excess.
And by the way, how long does a "thing" like overlanding have to be around before it's considered to have caught on?
I've been overlanding for over 25 years, is that long enough? Have I caught on yet? Am I OK to call it overlanding or do I have to adopt another name that means the same thing?
I like this lifestyle, I own a RTT, I have it mounted on my trailer. I wouldn't put that much weight on my roof because it restricts where I want to take my vehicle, but my objectives and adaptation aren't the same as everyone else's, in fact we're all quite different. If someone wants to put one on their roof, (Landcruiser, Kia Soul, Civic, whatever) they must know (or find out quickly) what restrictions and limitations they create.
This is an education. I've learned almost everything I know the hard way, or by observation of someone else's hard way.
I think I like that Thule and Tepui will be a family, I am optimistic that it will be a good thing for both the design of new equipment, as well as for the hobby / sport / lifestyle we call overlanding.
Thanks for posting a link to the article.
FWIW. Dan.